In partnership with
Reading time: 9 minutes
Greetings from above,
I once paid a consultant $500 to tell me to "think differently." Claude does it in about 30 seconds. For free.
I used to make essential business decisions the same way most people do. Based on gut feeling, what seemed normal, and what worked for someone else I vaguely remembered reading about. The results were, more or less, exactly as random as that sounds. Then I started using structured thinking frameworks inside Claude — the exact same ones that top consultants charge hundreds of dollars per hour to apply — and the quality of every decision I make changed completely.
Today, we'll talk about:
What "Decision Intelligence" prompting actually is and why it works so well
The 7 proven frameworks consultants use that you can now access through Claude
The exact prompts to copy and use today, for any problem or decision you are facing
Let's get into it.
A $200M+ DTC brand has 44 people messaging Viktor every day.
Their ops team built inventory command centers and reorder dashboards through Viktor. Supply chain gets daily stockout alerts before they happen. Marketing tracks ROAS and runs content calendars. CS has CSAT scores and support tickets triaged and briefed every morning in Slack, before the first support call. No dashboard digging.
48 internal apps, built through conversation. No code. No developer queue. Command centers, inventory dashboards, sales trackers, reorder systems.
That's one company. Across the platform, teams have built 2,000+ apps the same way: message Viktor in Slack, describe what you need, get a working tool deployed. No code. No six-week dev queue.
Your team doesn't wait for a product roadmap. They message a colleague.
5,700+ teams. SOC 2 certified.
"It was almost instantly adopted by the bulk of my team." — Boris Wexler, CEO, Space Dinosaurs
This Is Not A Gimmick
Smart Prompting Changes Your Thinking
Most people open Claude and type something like "help me with my business." They get a generic answer. They close the tab. They decide AI is overhyped.
That is not a Claude problem. That is a prompting problem.
In 2026, the best AI workflows have shifted from one-off chatting to reusable prompt systems. Instead of writing new instructions for every task, experienced users rely on reusable prompt frameworks — multi-phase prompts that turn Claude into a Strategic Advisor or a Market Intelligence Analyst.
The 7 frameworks in today's newsletter are not new ideas. They are battle-tested thinking models used by people like Charlie Munger, Jeff Bezos, Howard Marks, and the engineers at Toyota. What is new is that you can now access all of them through a single, well-written prompt — any time, for any problem, at zero extra cost.
Every prompt that actually works is just a compact way to deliver a clearer instruction. The label is not the magic. The instruction is. The single biggest improvement you can make to your Claude prompting is this: tell Claude exactly what role it should play, exactly what format you want, and exactly what success looks like.
These 7 prompts do exactly that — and they do it using the same logic the world's best decision-makers rely on.
How These Frameworks Help You
Real Problems Get Real Solutions
You stop making decisions based on what feels right and start making them based on what the evidence and logic actually say
You find the real root cause of problems instead of patching the same surface issue over and over again
You see the consequences of your choices — not just what happens next week, but what happens 6 to 12 months from now when most people are not looking that far ahead
Seven Prompts For Better Decisions
Copy Paste And Start Right Now
Here is the honest truth about these frameworks. They work because they force structured thinking. They work with or without Claude.
But with Claude, you get a thinking partner that actually pushes back, asks follow-up questions, and catches the assumptions you did not even know you were making.
Here are all 7 — explained simply and ready to use.
⚙️ Here's the step-by-step guide — all 7 prompts:
Framework 1 — First Principles Thinking
What it is: First Principles Thinking is used to reverse-engineer complex problems and encourage creativity. It involves breaking down problems into basic elements and reassembling them from the ground up. Elon Musk used it to build rockets for 2% of the normal cost. You can use it to rethink any business problem from scratch.
Why it works: Most people solve problems by copying what others have done. First Principles ignores all of that and asks — what is actually, undeniably true here? What are we just assuming?
The prompt:
"I'm dealing with a problem and I want you to help me think through it using First Principles Thinking. Don't give me advice based on convention or what's normally done. Instead, break my problem down to its most fundamental truths — the things that are undeniably true — and help me rebuild a solution from there. At each step, challenge my assumptions. If I'm taking something for granted, call it out and ask me to prove it's actually true. My problem: [DESCRIBE YOUR PROBLEM IN DETAIL]"Framework 2 — Inversion
What it is: Inversion is the mental model popularized by Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's business partner. Instead of asking how to succeed, you ask how to guarantee failure — then avoid everything on that list.
Why it works: Most people plan for success. Very few plan for failure in detail. The ones who do tend to build far more durable businesses because they have already thought through every way things could go wrong.
The prompt:
"I want you to help me solve a problem using Inversion, the mental model popularized by Charlie Munger. Instead of asking 'How do I succeed at this?', I want you to start by asking 'How would I guarantee failure at this?' List every way this could fail, every bad decision I could make, and every assumption that would destroy the outcome. Then flip each one into a concrete action I should take. My goal: [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE]"Framework 3 — The 5 Whys
What it is: The 5 Whys technique comes from management consulting and is based on asking "Why?" five times in a row — with the assumption that by the last Why, you will reach the true cause of a problem. It was originally built into the Toyota Production System and has been used by the world's best operations teams ever since.
Why it works: Most people fix symptoms. This framework forces you to keep asking why until you hit something structural — the actual thing that needs to change.
The prompt:
"I have a recurring problem and I need to find the actual root cause, not just the surface symptom. Use the 5 Whys method from the Toyota Production System. Start with the problem I describe. Ask 'Why does this happen?' Then take my answer and ask 'Why?' again. Repeat this at least 5 times, going deeper each round until we hit something structural that I can actually fix. Don't accept vague answers from me. Push me to be specific at every level. My recurring problem: [DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM YOU KEEP RUNNING INTO]"Framework 4 — Second-Order Thinking
What it is: Second-order thinking is a means of assessing the implications of decisions by considering future consequences. It encourages thinking outside of the immediate outcome and discourages defaulting to the most obvious choice. Howard Marks, one of the world's most respected investors, wrote extensively about this as the core difference between average and exceptional decision-making.
Why it works: Most people think one step ahead. Second-order thinking maps three layers of consequences — what happens immediately, what that causes next, and what that causes 6 to 12 months from now.
The prompt:
"I'm about to make a decision and I want you to help me think through it using Second-Order Thinking, as described by Howard Marks. Most people only think about the immediate result of a decision. I want you to map out the consequences in three layers: → First order: What happens immediately? → Second order: What does that cause to happen next? → Third order: What does THAT cause 6-12 months from now? Do this for both the 'I do it' and 'I don't do it' paths. Be brutally honest about the downstream effects. My decision: [DESCRIBE THE DECISION YOU'RE FACING]"Framework 5 — Regret Minimization Framework
What it is: Jeff Bezos created this framework when he was deciding whether to leave a high-paying Wall Street job to start Amazon. He asked himself one question — at 80 years old, which choice would he regret more? He picked Amazon. The rest is history.
Why it works: Logic is useful for small decisions. Big life and career decisions often need emotional clarity more than spreadsheets. This framework cuts through all the noise and gets you honest with yourself about what you actually want.
The prompt:
"I'm stuck on a major life or career decision. Help me think through it using Jeff Bezos's Regret Minimization Framework. Ask me to imagine myself at 80 years old looking back on this moment. From that vantage point, help me evaluate: → Which choice would I regret NOT taking? → Which risks would feel trivial in hindsight? → Which 'safe' option would haunt me? Don't let me hide behind logic. This framework is about emotional clarity, not spreadsheets. Push me to be honest about what I actually want. My decision: [DESCRIBE THE FORK IN THE ROAD YOU'RE FACING]"Framework 6 — Opportunity Cost Analysis
What it is: Every time you say yes to something, you are saying no to everything else you could do with that time, money, or energy. Opportunity Cost Analysis makes those invisible trade-offs visible — so you can actually see what you are giving up before you commit.
Why it works: Most people treat decisions as yes or no. This framework forces you to treat every decision as "this versus that" — which is the only honest way to evaluate any commitment.
The prompt:
"I want you to help me evaluate a commitment using Opportunity Cost Analysis. Every time I say yes to something, I'm saying no to everything else I could do with that time, money, or energy. I need you to make those invisible tradeoffs visible. For the commitment I describe, help me answer: → What specifically am I giving up by doing this? → What is the highest-value alternative use of the same resources? → If I could only pick one, which option builds more long-term value? Don't let me treat this as a yes/no decision. Frame it as a 'this versus that' decision. What I'm considering committing to: [DESCRIBE THE OPPORTUNITY OR COMMITMENT]"Framework 7 — Pre-Mortem Analysis
What it is: Psychologist Gary Klein developed this method for teams about to start a project. Instead of planning for success, you imagine the project has already failed — completely — and then work backwards to figure out every reason why. Then you fix those things before you even start.
Why it works: Most project planning is optimistic by default. Pre-Mortem forces you into a pessimistic, specific, scenario-level view of failure — which is actually the most useful lens for avoiding it.
The prompt:
"I'm about to start a project and I want you to run a Pre-Mortem Analysis on it, based on psychologist Gary Klein's method. Here's how it works: Imagine it's 6 months from now and this project has failed completely. It's dead. Now work backwards and tell me every plausible reason why it failed. Be specific. Don't give me generic risks like 'poor execution.' Give me scenario-level detail: what went wrong, when, and why I didn't see it coming. Then for each failure scenario, give me one preventive action I can take right now before I start. My project: [DESCRIBE YOUR UPCOMING PROJECT OR LAUNCH]"Seven Frameworks Quick Reference Guide
Everything You Need To Remember
First Principles — Break the problem to its most basic truths and rebuild from there. Stop borrowing answers from people who had different problems
Inversion — List every way to fail, then flip each one into an action. Charlie Munger built a fortune doing this
5 Whys — Ask why five times in a row until you hit something structural. Fix that, not the symptom
Second-Order Thinking — Map consequences three layers deep, on both the yes and no paths, before you commit to anything
Regret Minimization — Imagine yourself at 80. Which choice haunts you? Pick the other one
Opportunity Cost — Every yes is a no to everything else. Make those trade-offs visible before you say yes
Pre-Mortem — Assume the project failed. Work backwards. Fix the reasons before you start
Wrap Up: What You Learned Today
Three Lessons Worth Remembering
Lesson 1: The quality of your decisions is the quality of your business. Every framework in today's newsletter exists for one reason — to slow down your thinking just enough to catch the assumptions, blind spots, and downstream consequences that most people completely miss in the rush to move fast.
Lesson 2: Claude is not just a writing tool. When you prompt it with structured frameworks like these, it becomes a genuine thinking partner — one that pushes back on your logic, asks better follow-up questions than most advisors, and does not charge you $500 an hour to do it.
Lesson 3: Most people will read this, nod along, and never actually try a single prompt. The ones who open Claude today, paste one of these frameworks, and start thinking through a real problem they have been sitting on — those are the ones who will make a better decision this week than they would have otherwise.
Pick one problem you have been stuck on. Pick the framework that fits it best. Open Claude and paste the prompt. That is all it takes to start.
And as always, thanks for being a part of my lovely community,
Keep learning,
🔑 Robert from God of Prompt
P.S. We are running the final discount for May on godofprompt.ai/products. Grab your 30% Off with GOP_RELAUNCH_30
