Reading time: 11 minutes / Become my affiliate / Sponsor this newsletter

Greetings from above,

What do a mortgage lender, a DoorDash driver, and a Mastercard executive have in common? In two years, they might all be asking the same question: "What happened?"

Two weeks ago, Robert sent me an article at midnight. No commentary. Just a link. That's his version of pulling the fire alarm.

It was a piece from CitriniResearch. Two Wall Street analysts wrote a fictional "macro memo" from June 2028. A financial post-mortem. The S&P 500 down 38%. Unemployment at 10.2%. The mortgage market cracking. And the cause wasn't a pandemic or a housing bubble.

It was AI doing exactly what we keep saying it will do. Working. Fast. Cheap. Better.

I read it three times. Not because it's definitely going to happen. But because every single domino they describe is already sitting on the table. And I realized: most people building businesses with AI have no idea what the second and third order effects of this technology look like.

This newsletter is about those effects. And how to position yourself on the right side of them.

Today's newsletter will show you:

  • The 5-stage economic chain reaction that Wall Street is quietly modeling

  • Why AI success for companies could mean economic disaster for everyone else

  • The specific industries and business models most at risk (and when)

  • A prompt system to stress-test YOUR business against this scenario

Let's build your competitive advantage!

Wall Street Just Named the Most Crowded Trades of 2026

AI stocks. Metals. Crypto.

Surprise, surprise; gold crashed 16%. Silver plunged 34%. Bitcoin dropped to 1 year lows.

All supposedly "uncorrelated" assets moving in lockstep largely because of overleveraged margin.

JPM strategists warn that the same leverage is still a risk.

Those markets may be recovering now, but cascading liquidations could trigger quickly across several asset classes simultaneously.

So much for diversifying away risk, right?

But get this–

70,819 everyday investors have allocated $1.3 billion fractionally across 500+ exclusive investments. 

Not real estate or PE… Blue-chip art. Sounds crazy, right?

Now it’s easy to invest in art featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso, thanks to Masterworks.

They do the heavy lifting from acquisition to sale, so you can diversify with the strategy typically limited to the ultra-wealthy.

(Past sales delivered net returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8% on works held longer than a year.)*

*Investing involves risk.  Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd

🎯 THE 2028 SCENARIO: What Wall Street Is Quietly Modeling

This isn't doom-posting. It's scenario planning. The best investors and strategists don't predict one future. They model multiple futures and prepare for all of them.

Here's the scenario, broken into five stages.

Each one is already showing early signals in 2026.

📚 STAGE 1: The Layoff Paradox (Already Happening)

Companies adopt AI. Margins expand. Earnings beat expectations. Stocks rally. Everyone celebrates.

But here's the trap. When companies cut white-collar headcount, the savings flow straight into more AI capability. Each round of layoffs funds the technology that enables the next round.

The feedback loop:

  • AI gets better and cheaper

  • Companies need fewer workers

  • Savings fund more AI investment

  • AI gets better and cheaper

  • Repeat. No natural brake.

The analysts call this the "Intelligence Displacement Spiral." It's a loop with no off switch. Each company's individual decision is rational. The collective result is catastrophic.

Why it matters for you: If your business model depends on selling services to employed white-collar professionals, your customer base is shrinking. Not someday. Now.

📚 STAGE 2: Ghost GDP (The Numbers Lie)

GDP keeps growing. Productivity stats look incredible. Politicians brag about the numbers.

But the output is being generated by machines, not people. The analysts coined a perfect term for it: "Ghost GDP." Output that shows up in national accounts but never circulates through the real economy.

Think about it this way. A GPU cluster in North Dakota can produce the work of 10,000 white-collar employees in Manhattan. GDP counts that output. But those 10,000 people aren't getting paid anymore. They aren't spending at restaurants, buying homes, or renewing their gym memberships.

The key question nobody's asking: How much money do machines spend on discretionary goods? Zero.

The US consumer economy is 70% of GDP. When the consumers get replaced, the economy looks healthy on paper while the actual money flow between humans dries up.

📚 STAGE 3: Friction Goes to Zero (Your Moat Is Gone)

This is the stage that should terrify every business owner reading this.

AI agents don't just replace workers. They replace the human behaviors that entire business models depend on.

Here's what dies when AI agents handle consumer decisions:

Subscription inertia. Your customers forget to cancel. AI agents don't forget. They audit every recurring charge monthly.

Brand loyalty. You spent millions building habitual app usage. An agent doesn't have a home screen. It checks every option every time.

Price ignorance. Humans don't have time to compare prices across five platforms. Machines do it in milliseconds.

Information asymmetry. Real estate agents, financial advisors, insurance brokers, anyone whose value was "I know things you don't" is exposed. AI agents know the same things. Instantly.

Payment friction. The 2-3% credit card interchange fee exists because cards are convenient. When agents find cheaper payment rails (stablecoins, direct transfers), that fee evaporates.

The analysts describe DoorDash as the poster child. Its entire moat was: "You're hungry, you're lazy, this app is on your home screen." An agent doesn't have a home screen. It checks 30 delivery apps and picks the cheapest one every time.

Why it matters for you: Audit every revenue stream in your business. Ask: "Does this revenue depend on my customer being too busy, too lazy, or too uninformed to find a better option?" If yes, that revenue has an expiration date.

📚 STAGE 4: The Daisy Chain Breaks (Finance Gets Ugly)

Private equity firms spent the last decade buying software companies with borrowed money. The loans were backed by "Annual Recurring Revenue." The assumption: subscription revenue keeps recurring.

AI broke that assumption. When AI agents can replace your SaaS tool, that "recurring" revenue becomes "revenue that hasn't left yet."

The scenario describes Zendesk, taken private for $10.2 billion, defaulting on its $5 billion loan. Customer service AI replaced the entire product category.

But here's where it gets systemic. The "permanent capital" funding these loans came from life insurance companies. Firms like Apollo bought insurers (Athene), then invested policyholder money into the same PE-backed tech debt that was now defaulting.

Translation: Regular people's retirement savings and annuities were invested in loans to software companies that AI is killing. The "sophisticated institutional capital" that was supposed to absorb losses was actually Main Street's money wearing a different hat.

Why it matters for you: If your retirement is in a variable annuity or life insurance product from a major alternative asset manager, understand what it's actually invested in. Ask questions.

📚 STAGE 5: The Mortgage Question (The Big One)

The US mortgage market is $13 trillion. Every mortgage assumes the borrower will stay employed at roughly their current income for 30 years.

What happens when that assumption breaks? Not because the loans were bad (like 2008), but because the world changed after the loans were written?

The scenario describes 780 FICO borrowers, 20% down payments, perfect credit histories, starting to miss payments. Not because they were irresponsible. Because their $180,000 product manager job was replaced by a $200/month AI agent.

In the 2008 crisis, the loans were bad on day one. In this scenario, the loans were good on day one. The economy shifted underneath them.

The math is brutal: The top 20% of earners drive 65% of all consumer spending. When these people lose jobs or take 50% pay cuts, the consumption hit is massive relative to the number of jobs lost.

Why it matters for you: If you're carrying a mortgage based on a white-collar salary, build reserves aggressively. If you're selling to white-collar consumers, diversify your customer base.

⚡ The Intelligence Premium Is Unwinding

Here's the thesis at the core of this entire scenario, in one paragraph:

For all of modern economic history, human intelligence was the scarce input. Capital was abundant. Resources were substitutable. But the ability to analyze, decide, create, and coordinate could not be replicated at scale. Every institution, from the labor market to the tax code to the mortgage system, was built on that assumption. AI is now unwinding that premium. Human intelligence is becoming less scarce and less valuable. The financial system is repricing. And that repricing is painful.

This doesn't mean collapse is inevitable. It means the economy needs new frameworks. And the analysts make an important point: building those frameworks is one of the few tasks left that only humans can do.

The canary is still alive. We still have time to position ourselves correctly.

🛠️ 5 Things You Should Do Right Now

1. Stress-test your revenue against the "zero friction" scenario.

Go through every line of revenue. Ask: "Would an AI agent, acting on behalf of my customer, still choose me?" If your value is convenience, habit, or information advantage, you're exposed.

2. Build for the "middle" economy, not just the top.

The white-collar spending class is at risk. Businesses that serve ONLY high-earning professionals are concentrated in the blast zone. Diversify your customer base across income levels.

3. Own the relationship, not the transaction.

AI agents optimize transactions. They can't replace genuine community, trust, and identity. The businesses that survive the zero-friction economy will be the ones that built something machines can't replicate. Think: memberships, communities, brands people identify with.

4. Stack cash. Seriously.

The scenario describes displaced workers burning through savings for two to three quarters before the data catches up. If your income depends on a white-collar role, build a bigger buffer than feels comfortable. If you run a business, build reserves for a 6-month revenue dip.

5. Position yourself as the human-in-the-loop, not the human being replaced.

The new jobs that AI creates pay less and are fewer. But they exist. The winners are people who direct AI, not people who compete with it. Use AI as your tool. Build systems. Become the person who orchestrates the machines, not the person the machines replace.

⚙️ THE AI DISRUPTION STRESS-TEST PROMPT

💡 Use this prompt to run the same scenario analysis on YOUR business. It applies the five-stage framework from the article to your specific situation and gives you a concrete risk report with action steps.

#CONTEXT:
You are a Macro-Economic Risk Strategist who specializes in
second and third-order effects of technological disruption.

You understand the concept of 'Intelligence Displacement
Spirals' where AI adoption creates self-reinforcing feedback
loops: better AI > fewer workers > lower spending > margin
pressure > more AI adoption > repeat.

#ROLE:
You are a Senior Analyst at a macro hedge fund. You don't
care about hype or optimism. You care about modeling downside
scenarios that most people ignore. Your job is to find the
vulnerabilities that look invisible until they're obvious.

#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
Analyze the user's business through five disruption lenses:
1. LABOR EXPOSURE: What percentage of the user's cost
   structure is white-collar labor that AI could replace
   within 18 months? What roles specifically?

2. CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION: What percentage of revenue comes
   from white-collar professionals whose incomes are at risk?
   Would a 30% decline in that customer segment's spending
   be survivable?

3. FRICTION DEPENDENCY: Which revenue streams depend on
   customer inertia, information asymmetry, or habitual
   behavior that AI agents will eliminate? (subscriptions,
   brand loyalty, price ignorance, convenience moats)

4. FINANCIAL CHAIN RISK: Is the business funded by, or
   does it depend on, credit structures that assume
   continued white-collar employment and spending?
   (Mortgages, PE-backed debt, ARR-based loans)

5. FEEDBACK LOOP POSITION: Where does this business sit
   in the Intelligence Displacement Spiral? Is it the
   company cutting workers? The company selling to those
   workers? The company lending to those workers? All three?

#TASK CRITERIA:
- Rate each lens from 1 (minimal exposure) to 5 (critical)
- Provide a composite DISRUPTION RISK SCORE (1-25)
- For any lens rated 4 or 5, provide a specific 90-day
  action plan to reduce exposure
- Include one 'Black Swan' scenario the user hasn't
  considered
- End with the single most important strategic move

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- My Business: [DESCRIBE YOUR BUSINESS MODEL]
- My Revenue Sources: [LIST PRIMARY REVENUE STREAMS]
- My Customer Profile: [WHO PAYS YOU]
- My Team Size: [NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND ROLES]
- My Industry: [YOUR SECTOR]

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
## DISRUPTION STRESS-TEST: [BUSINESS NAME]
### LENS 1: LABOR EXPOSURE [SCORE /5]
[Analysis with specific roles at risk and timeline]

### LENS 2: CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION [SCORE /5]
[Analysis with spending decline modeling]

### LENS 3: FRICTION DEPENDENCY [SCORE /5]
[Revenue streams ranked by agent-vulnerability]

### LENS 4: FINANCIAL CHAIN RISK [SCORE /5]
[Credit and funding structure analysis]

### LENS 5: FEEDBACK LOOP POSITION [SCORE /5]
[Where you sit in the displacement spiral]

## COMPOSITE DISRUPTION RISK SCORE: [X/25]
[Overall assessment and severity classification]

## BLACK SWAN SCENARIO
[The thing you haven't considered]

## PRIORITY ACTION PLAN
[90-day action steps for highest-risk lenses]

Customize these variables:

  • [DESCRIBE YOUR BUSINESS MODEL]: Be specific. "SaaS for HR teams" is better than "tech company."

  • [LIST PRIMARY REVENUE STREAMS]: Subscriptions, consulting, services, product sales. Include rough percentages.

  • [WHO PAYS YOU]: Job titles, income levels, industries. The more specific, the better the analysis.

  • [NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND ROLES]: Include which roles are customer-facing vs. back-office.

  • [YOUR SECTOR]: Industry context changes everything. A plumber and a SaaS founder face very different risks.

📋 SUMMARY 📋

  • AI success for companies may be a disaster for the economy. The Intelligence Displacement Spiral is a feedback loop with no natural brake. Each layoff funds the technology that enables the next one.

  • Five dominoes are already set up. Layoff paradox, Ghost GDP, zero friction, financial chain risk, and the mortgage question. Each one reinforces the others.

  • Your moat might be made of friction. Any revenue that depends on customer inertia, habit, or information asymmetry has an expiration date. AI agents will find the better deal every time.

  • The Stress-Test prompt reveals your exposure. Run it on your business, your competitors, and your biggest clients. Know your risk score before the market figures it out for you.

📚 FREE RESOURCES 📚

📦 WRAP UP 📦

What you learned today:

  1. The Intelligence Displacement Spiral - The self-reinforcing loop where AI adoption drives layoffs that fund more AI adoption. No natural brake exists.

  2. The Five Stages of Disruption - From the Layoff Paradox through Ghost GDP, Zero Friction, Financial Contagion, to the Mortgage Question. Each stage is already showing early signals.

  3. The AI Disruption Stress-Test - A prompt that scores your business across five risk lenses and gives you a 90-day action plan to reduce exposure.

This isn't about being bearish on AI. We're more bullish than ever.

It's about understanding that a tool powerful enough to 10x your business is also powerful enough to 10x the disruption around you.

The people who win aren't the ones who ignore the second-order effects. They're the ones who see them first and position accordingly.

No more building on assumptions that won't survive the decade.

You now have the frameworks to see what's coming. And the prompts to prepare.

Login or Subscribe to participate

And as always, thanks for being part of my lovely community,

Keep building systems,

🔑 Alex from God of Prompt

P.S. What's your biggest vulnerability? Reply and tell me the one revenue stream you're most worried about. I'll break down how to defend it in a future issue.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading